blank
 

Please Do Not Read The Text Below.

Download the original file at

Advertising Reaction Study

We copied the scrambled text from pdf file (that's how it gets copied, sorry we had no control) so the keywords would be searchable.

 
 
 
Google
 
www.dynamiclogic.com
3 Park Avenue Floor 37 New York, NY 10016 t 212-591-9177 f 646-742-4910
Advertising Reaction Study
Executive Summary - November 2001
Study objectives:
The study, which was conducted through an online survey, aimed to measure the following
three general topics:
• General consumer attitudes towards online advertising
• Perceptions of different forms of online advertising
o How pop-ups compare to various forms of offline media
o The number of pop-ups appropriate to keep content sites free to consumers
• Consumer attitudes towards advertising in times of war
Methodology:
The data was gathered through an online survey hosted by Dynamic Logic. Respondents
were invited to participate via email and offered a chance to win a sweepstakes as an
incentive. The invited list of 5,000 was randomly selected from Dynamic Logic’s database of
respondents who have participated in prior research. All respondents in the database were
recruited via random sampling on websites. 413 respondents completed the survey, which
is an 8% response rate. The data was gathered from September 28 – 30, 2001.1
Findings:
1. Banners generate the most favorable opinions
• Over half of the consumers in the study (53%) have a positive attitude towards the
banner format of online advertising.
Results indicate that consumers have become accustomed to the standard banner format,
with its relatively small size and non-intrusive delivery. Its appeal is high compared to other
online ad formats. The newer, larger formats rank second and third, respectively, with 35%
of respondents indicating they are positive about skyscrapers and 17% about large
rectangles. On the other end of the spectrum, only a small number of respondents had
positive feelings towards the more intrusive formats such as pop-ups (6% positive) and full
pages interstitials (3% positive).
1 The data was gathered through an online survey, with a sample of 413 consumers. Respondents were recruited from
Dynamic Logic’s database via an email invitation. Respondents who reside in the Dynamic Logic database have been
recruited through various forms such as email, banners, links, referrals, and pop-ups. The results for this study were
weighted to the US online population profile to reduce any potential bias towards pop-ups.
www.dynamiclogic.com
3 Park Avenue Floor 37 New York, NY 10016 t 212-591-9177 f 646-742-4910
2. Consumers feel advertising is necessary to keep sites free, even if the ads are
distracting
• 85% of respondents agreed to the statement: “Advertising is necessary to support
the web sites I like to visit and keep them free, even if the ads distract me from what
I am doing”.
The result demonstrates that consumers recognize value in online content and feel that
advertising is necessary to access online content at no charge. Despite the distracting nature
of advertising, the fact that 85% agreed with the statement illustrates the value of free online
content to the consumer.
3. Pop-ups on par with TV ads and Direct Mail in their desirability
Because it is likely that people will always prefer less advertising to more, Dynamic Logic
sought to explore consumers’ relative attitudes to different forms of advertising; specifically,
how consumers felt about pop-ups in comparison to other forms of advertising. This is an
important question for the online advertising industry and for our company, which
frequently employs pop-ups to recruit research respondents.
Respondents were asked to compare pop-ups to other forms of advertising in terms of
desirability. The chart below shows the calculated mean perception relative to pop-ups and
how each individual forms of advertising were indexed against that mean.
The results indicate that consumers put pop-ups roughly on par with TV ads and Direct Mail
in terms of relative desirability. Telemarketing and Direct Mail are less desirable than popups,
while Print, Radio, and Billboard advertising are more desirable forms of advertising.
How Do Other Ad Formats Compare to Pop-Ups:
Are They Less, Equally, or More Desirable?
Chart Shows Each Ad Format Indexed to Pop-Up Score
Telemarketing
Direct mail TV
Billboard Radio
Magazine Newspaper
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Pop-Ups
Desirability
Baseline
(More Desirable Than Pop-Ups)
(Less Desirable Than Pop-Ups)
Results show TV and
Direct Mail are equally
desirable to Pop-Ups
Source: Dynamic Logic, Beyond The Click / Ad Reaction Study, N=413, 09/01
www.dynamiclogic.com
3 Park Avenue Floor 37 New York, NY 10016 t 212-591-9177 f 646-742-4910
This data should not be misinterpreted to suggest that pop-ups, TV, and Direct Mail are
equally effective with consumers. But it is possible that when respondents factor in multiple
considerations (duration of exposure to creative, ability to control/end experience,
targeting/relevancy, interactivity, etc.), they view pop-ups comparable to other forms of
advertising in terms of intrusiveness and desirability----one more fact of life in an adsupported
media world.
4. Consumers will accept limited number of pop-ups to access preferred and free
online content
• 72% feel some pop-ups are appropriate; the mean number is 3 per hour
Respondents were asked how many pop-ups PER HOUR they feel are APPROPRIATE to
support the free web sites they like to use. 28% of the sample said no number of pop-ups
were appropriate even to support a web site they liked, while 72% indicated that some
amount of pop-ups per hour. Among the latter group, the amount deemed appropriate
varied.
The chart on the right
shows how the various
thresholds for pop-up
tolerance with 18%
supporting one pop-up per
hour, 26% supporting 2-3
pop-ups per hour and so
on. The calculated mean
rounds up to 3 pop-ups
per hour as the general
level of "appropriateness."
As other data in the survey
demonstrates, consumers
are for the most part open
to the necessity of online
advertising, and they are willing to endure a certain level of distraction if it means that the
web sites they like to visit are free.
5. Consumers provide strong support to advertising during the periods of war and
expect advertisers to be sensitive about the issue
• 67% feel that US companies should advertise the same (as they would normally do)
or more during periods of war.
o 8% say they should advertise more than non-war period
o 59% say they should advertise the same as non-war period
• 13% feel that US companies should advertise less
"Appropriate" Number of Pop-Ups Per Hour
No pop-ups
28%
1 pop-up
18%
2 to 3 pop-ups
26%
4 to 6 pop-ups
21%
7+ pop-ups
7%
Mean:
3 per hour
Note: Unaided answers that were coded, respondents wrote in number
Source: Dynamic Logic, Beyond The Click/Ad Reaction Study, N=413, 09/01
www.dynamiclogic.com
3 Park Avenue Floor 37 New York, NY 10016 t 212-591-9177 f 646-742-4910
• 20% did not have conclusive opinion about advertising during the war.
The respondents were asked to comment on reasons for their opinion to the question. The
majority of those surveyed indicated that they want the US economy to remain strong and
feel that advertising is necessary to support it. Many also indicated that they do not want life
to change drastically as a result of war and see advertising as part of "everyday life." In fact,
over half felt that advertising should remain the same as a non-war period, while 20% did
not have conclusive opinions.
Many expressed mixed feelings about the content of ads as well as the interfering nature of
advertising (getting in the way of getting important information/news out to public.) Some
respondents advise advertisers to link their efforts to patriotism and supporting the effort,
but not to the point where it seems they are jumping on the bandwagon for commercial
reasons. Generally speaking, the results demonstrate that advertisers should continue to
advertise while properly addressing sensitive issues surrounding the war and crisis.
Below are some select verbatim responses and general themes from each cohort, gathered
from an open-ended question about why respondents answered the way they did about
whether companies should advertise more of less during a time of war.
MORE group:
• "Advertising is a means to continue the growth of our economy."
• " Consumers are the new soldiers of war in the new millennium."
• " To help the war effort."
SAME group:
• "The business of the country needs to continue."
• " The more life stays the same, the more stable our economy will be."
• " By advertising less, we would be giving the enemy what they want..."
LESS group:
• "People will be trying to find news about war, not ads."
• "War time is not a time for corporations to be concerned about their profits."
• " Are we there to win a war or there to make a profit?"
• " In a time of crisis, I don't want to know who has the best phone service."
DON'T KNOW group:
• "Depends on the product or service being advertised..."
• "There are all kinds of wars going on all over the planet - why should advertising be
subject to any special rule?"
• "Should be the last thing on people's minds."
• "It's not about more versus less, it's about WHAT to advertise."
www.dynamiclogic.com
3 Park Avenue Floor 37 New York, NY 10016 t 212-591-9177 f 646-742-4910
There are interesting implications here for companies that are trying to determine what they
should do regarding their advertising. Based on the initial read - the majority of those
surveyed (two-thirds) want the US economy to remain strong and feel that advertising is part
of that equation. They also don't want life to change drastically as a result of war and they
see advertising as part of "everyday life." Nonetheless, many people have mixed feelings
about the content of some ads as well as the interfering nature of advertising (getting in the
way of getting important information/news out to public.) Clearly, the subject is a sensitive
one, and may depend greatly on the product/service being sold.
Of course, these results may vary depending on an advertiser’s target audience. But generally
speaking, it would seem that companies should continue to advertise, but with instructions
to publishers to pull ads during intense crises. This is standard practice for many publishers.
It should also be noted that our study shows that 85% of those surveyed agree with the
notion that disruptive advertising is necessary to keep the web sites they like to visit free.
In summary, consumers accept many different kinds of advertising online and offline, and
while they may not love advertising, they appreciate its role in keeping the economy strong,
especially in time of war.
For more information on this study, please contact:
Dan Safran
dan@dynamiclogic.com
212-591-9177
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Optimism, Happiness, Self Esteem, Creativity, Competency, Achieve Intrinsic Motivation; visit www.motivationbook.com

Iconocast is about learning and teaching without borders; we offer eMarketing, Internet Advertising, Internet Marketing, Search Engine Optimization, Search Engine Marketing, Online Branding, and eMarketing News Services.

 © 2002-2006

Keywords: