Branding Laws · Internet Marketing · eMarketing · Internet Advertising · Online Branding |
| |
| |||||||

The great Eighteenth Century German Philosopher Alexander Baumgarten invented the word Aesthetics from the greek word aisthetikos (meaning "perceptive, especially by feeling"). Baumgarten coined the term to refer to a special branch of philosophy that aims to produce "a science of sensuous knowledge in contrast with logic, whose goal is truth.
People's love of aesthetics, a total sensory experience, has provided Brands a new avenue to achieve acceptance and popularity. Most branding experts have realized that the aesthetics of products are sometimes more effective than the products themselves.
Lalique bottles originally were inexpensive bottles that held perfumes. I personally feel the story of Lalique is the most classic and the best example of selling aesthetics.
Lalique Glass from the Glass Encyclopedia
Rene Lalique (1860-1945) was a French "art nouveau" jeweler and sculptor who became interested in glass in his 30's and rented his first glassworks at the age of 49 (in 1909) near Fontainbleu in France. Over the next thirty years he became the world's leading art glass designer of the art deco period.
|
The strategy is about creating sassy, desirable visual images, sophisticated refinements, timelessness, smart colorful designs, soothing, stylish, and/or distinctive identity for your Branded product.

Here are some phrases and adjectives that differentiate aesthetics products:
They are soft, relaxing, contemporary, accentuate natural elements, boast an unique quality, exhibit superb operations, famous for attentive service, superb craftsmanship, positive impressions, multifaceted personalities, sense of grandiose, and irresistible appeal.
They might come with enhancing emotional contact using high tech.
Communication theory and the research on the subject of persuasion provides a distinction between two kinds of messages, the central message and the peripheral message. The peripheral message concerns the tangential elements of the main message. These are about package, attractiveness of the presenter, the color of the room and/or the music. Aesthetics concerns the peripheral message.
1) Aesthetics creates Loyalty
2) Aesthetics allows for premium pricing
3) Aesthetic has a higher message impact when you are concerned with advertising of the product

| Libraries Business News |
Keywords LUXURY CONSUMERS MARKETS RICH WEALTHY FINERY MONEY INCOME |
|
Contact Information Available for logged-in reporters only |
||
Description Luxury consumers in the U.S. and much of Western Europe are remarkably similar in many ways, especially in the emphasis consumers place on experiences, rather than something that one has or owns, according to a report released today by the Consumer Research Center of The Conference Board. |
||
Newswise — Luxury consumers in the U.S. and much of Western Europe are remarkably similar in many ways, especially in the emphasis consumers place on experiences, rather than something that one has or owns, according to a report released today by the Consumer Research Center of The Conference Board.
The report was sponsored by Conde Nast Publications, Gucci Group, Gibson USA, The Ritz Carlton and Tru Vue and is based on an online survey of 1800 affluent consumers in the U.S., China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the UK. Respondents were over age 18 and in the top 25% income brackets.
“Consumers have remarkably similar perspectives on how to define luxury,” says Lynn Franco, Director of The Conference Board Consumer Research Center. “The largest share of luxury consumers (44%) and the largest share of consumers in each country most strongly agree that ‘luxury is having enough time to do whatever you want and being able to afford it.’ So, for luxury consumers worldwide, time is the ultimate luxury.”
Time is the most highly valued luxury (named by 35% of respondents as best matching their personal definition of luxury), then life experiences (25%), followed by having comfort, beauty and quality (18%).
About one-fourth or fewer luxury consumers strongly agree that:
* Luxury is less about the material things one has or one owns and more about how one experiences life, a sense of happiness and satisfaction (26% strongly agree).
* Luxury is being comfortably well off and not having to worry about tomorrow (25% strongly agree).
* Luxury is the finer things in life that surround you with extreme comfort, beauty, and quality (25% strongly agree).
* Luxury is the “best of the best” in all aspects of your life (18% strongly agree).
Luxury consumers’ favorite pursuits worldwide include high-tech activities and travel. High-tech activities, such as using a personal computer, the Internet, or a cell phone, rank as the most participated in lifestyle activities by nearly three-fourths of all luxury consumers. Travel comes next, with 69% of luxury consumers worldwide reporting an interest.
The most popular status luxuries owned across the countries surveyed were collections of antiques and rare items (30% of all luxury consumers report earning); original art, paintings and sculpture (31%); and vacation/second home (27%). American luxury consumers led in ownership of antiques or collections of rare items, while the Italian luxury consumers were more likely to own original art. The Italian luxury consumers also enjoy the highest share of vacation or second homes.
The next most widely owned status luxuries included collections of fine jewelry and watches (24%), fine musical instruments (22%), and collections of fine wine and spirits. Chinese luxury consumers led the other countries in ownership of fine jewelry and watches and in fine wine and spirits ownership, while the French consumers have the highest incidence of fine musical instrument ownership.
Compared with luxury consumers living in other countries, Japanese consumers trail in their participation in the various lifestyle activities included in the survey, such as photography (enjoyed by only 30% in Japan, compared to the international average of 59%); avid book reading (35% versus a 58% average of all countries); listening to records, tapes, DVDs (37% versus 56%).
Other key differences across cultures include:
* American consumers are noted for their interest in cable/satellite television, pets, physical fitness and health foods, electronics, and investing in stocks and bonds.
* British consumers are distinctive in their strong interest in Internet and cell phone usage, videos/DVDs, wine, gourmet goods, health foods, avid book reading, and cable/satellite TV.
* German consumers are more involved in reading books, attending cultural events, gardening, and home furnishings. Italian consumers share many of the same interests as those in Germany, but they are more active in travel. French consumers are similar to those in Germany and Italy, too, but with an even greater interest in gourmet food and wine.
* China has the greatest interest in photography, electronics, and home furnishings.
“For the largest share of luxury consumers, luxury is not specifically related to how much something costs or what brand it might be,” says Pamela Danziger, President of Unity Marketing and author of the report. “Luxury is highly personal and something the individual interprets and judges for him or herself. But while luxury is highly personal and separated from price and brand, luxury is expected to be something with a quality that sets it far above the ordinary product.”
Luxury is noticeably a cut above the average, as 81% of luxury consumers agreed. Luxury is about the feelings the consumers get in enjoying their luxury lifestyles, so it is very much an experience, rather than a material good one has or one owns. Luxury is being able to pursue one’s personal passions and interests.
Because it is defined personally and about one’s experience, luxury is something that everyone can partake in. Nearly three-fourths of those surveyed agreed that “luxury is for everyone and different for everyone.” It is not exclusive to one class or group of people.
The vast majority of luxury consumers say they reject conspicuous consumption or buying to impress. The person who most matters when it comes to luxury is the individual and how he or she experiences, interprets, and feels about his or her own luxury lifestyle—not what some neighbor, colleague, or coworker thinks.
While brands don’t necessarily define luxury, many luxury consumers look to the brand and the brand’s reputation as a signal of quality. China is the only country surveyed in which a significant portion of consumers (46%) tend to agree with luxury being defined by the brand.
Source: The Global Luxury Market: Exploring the Mindset of Luxury Consumers in Seven Countries
Consumer Research Center Special Report, June 2007, The Conference Board
A Sense of Scarcity: Why it seems like all the good ones are taken
Singles’ bars, classified personals and dating websites are a reflection, not only of the common human desire to find a mate, but of the sense of scarcity that seems to surround the hunt. Many people participate in dating activities in the hopes of finding that special someone, yet feel as though it is an impossible task. However, thanks to an international team of psychologists, the solution may be closer than we think—within ourselves, to be exact.
Xianchi Dai, Klaus Wertenbroch and Miguel Brendl from INSEAD, the international business school with campuses in France and Singapore, have been studying what they call the “value heuristic.” A heuristic is a sort of cognitive short cut or “rule of thumb” that we use when we are unable to make a truly informed decision. The psychologists’ research suggests that many mate-seekers are unwittingly subbing something clear and simple -- their yearning for a potential mate -- for a complicated and unknowable statistic (i.e., how many of the relationship-worthy bachelors and bachelorettes are still available).
The connection between scarcity and value is something we all know; for example, gold is considered precious because it is rare, not because it makes for a poor construction material. The psychologists’ research suggests that this link has become deep-wired into our neurons, so that even its inverse is unconsciously called upon for life decisions -- what’s valuable must be scarce.
To test their value heuristic theory, the researchers had a group of young people view nearly one hundred pictures, half of birds and half of flowers, in random order. They then told participants that they would get paid a few cents either for each bird picture or for each flower picture they had seen. To determine whether a participant would be paid for bird or for flower pictures, the researchers let each participant flip a coin. Before being paid accordingly, all participants were asked to estimate the total number of bird pictures and the total number of flower pictures they had seen.
The results were unambiguous. As described in the January issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, people who were paid for spotting flower pictures thought there were fewer flowers than birds, and likewise, those who were made to value birds determined they were scarcer than flowers. Nobody knew that in fact there were exactly the same number of flowers and birds.
So in effect, their experimentally-induced yearning caused them to wrongly perceive scarcity.
To increase the validity of their findings, the scientists ran several other experiments. In one, participants of both sexes viewed portraits of men and women, some attractive and some not. When questioned later, both men and women believed that there were fewer attractive people of the opposite sex than there were of the same sex.
If the portraits were unattractive, they tended not to perceive a sense of scarcity. As in the first experiment, the participants appeared to be substituting their emotional desire for calculation, and ended up believing that what they wanted was less likely to be found.
The results, therefore, suggest that people rely on some deeply ingrained judgmental heuristics when estimating frequencies and probabilities in everyday life, heuristics that can sometimes go astray, for example, when implying a more solitary life than might be warranted by reality.
Author Contact: Xianchi Dai xianchi.dai@insead.edu
###
Psychological Science is ranked among the top 10 general psychology journals for impact by the Institute for Scientific Information. A related blog, written by Wray Herbert for the Association for Psychological Science, is available at http://www.psychologicalscience.org/onlyhuman. For a copy of the article “The Value Heuristic in Judgments of Relative Frequency” and access to other Psychological Science research findings, please contact Katie Kline at (202) 783-2077 or kkline@psychologicalscience.org.