Do your homework before home auctions Arizona Republic, AZ - The Arizona Department of Real Estate does require home-auction companies to obtain a real-estate license, but it does not dictate auction terms. ...
Maybe It's Time to Buy Washington Post, United States - It makes you feel like crawling into a cellar, closing the door and not coming out until the all-clear signal sounds. But even though housing and stocks may...
Sons Share an Event but Not the Fame New York Times, United States - Some may try to make their own names. Mark O?Meara?s son, Shaun; Vijay Singh?s 18-year-old son, Qass, whose huge shoulder turn and flexible action mirrors ...
Taxes rise, spirits fall as state OKs local rates Boston Globe, United States - At the local level, assessors try regularly to educate homeowners that municipal budgets, not home values, determine the amount to be raised through taxes, ...
Maybe It?s Time to Buy That First House New York Times, United States - Dec 5, 2008 One study, ?The Changing Prospects for Building Home Equity,? tries to predict where today?s first-time buyers in the 100 biggest metropolitan areas may...
Source: Google News
Recent News and Articles on the Keywords: 0.28 + web + 520 Related to the article below (Last Update: 8/4/2008)
eBay Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2008 Results Trading Markets (press release), CA - Jul 16, 2008 ... of gross merchandise volume 39% 41% 42% eBay Stores (5) (in thousands) 649 520 532 Current quarter vs prior quarter 3% (20%) 2% Current quarter vs prior ...EBAY
Wachovia Details 2nd Quarter Loss; Outlines Initiatives to ... PR Newswire (press release), NY - Jul 22, 2008 Web cast Instructions: To gain access to the web cast, which will be "listen-only," go to Wachovia.com/investor and click on the link "Wachovia Second ...WB
Source: Google News
[CITATION] Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts - P Chatterjee, DL Hoffman, TP Novak - Marketing Science, 2003 - INFORMS ... 4, Fall 2003, pp. 520?541 0732-2399/03/2204/0520 1526-548X electronic ISSN Page
2. MODELING THE CLICKSTREAM: IMPLICATIONS FOR WEB-BASED ADVERTISING EFFORTS ...
Trust management for the semantic web - M Richardson, R Agrawal, P Domingos - Proceedings of the Second International Semantic Web …, 2003 - Springer ... 0.7 0.504 0.28 0.9 0.5 0.7 concatenate (multiply) aggregate (maximum) 0.7 Fig. 1.
Path Algebra belief merging on an example web of trust Page 5. ...
Session-based overload control in QoS-aware Web servers - H Chen, P Mohapatra - INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the …, 2002 - ieeexplore.ieee.org ... Next we propose a dynamic weighted fair sharing (DWFS) scheme based on the temporal
relationship in web session in such a manner that the ...520 IEEE INFOCOM 2002 ...
Absorbent web structure - K Horimoto, Y Morita - US Patent 4,655,877, 1987 - freepatentsonline.com ... Using the treated cut fibers, a web was produced in the same way as in Example 1.
The web was treated in an air oven at ... 3 12.8 0.28 300< 300< (Emulgen 108) CEx ...
Web usage mining: Sequential pattern extraction with a very low support - F Masseglia, D Tanasa, B Trousse - 6th Asia-Pacific Web Conference, APWeb, Hangzhou, China, 2004 - Springer ...520 F. Masseglia, D. Tanasa, and B. Trousse ...Web Usage Mining: Sequential Pattern
Extraction with a ... recherche/equipes/listes/index.fr.html)> (support: 0.28%) . ...
How Large Is the World Wide Web? - A Dobra, SE Fienberg - Web Dynamics-Adapting to Change in Content, Size, Topology … - books.google.com How Large Is the World Wide Web?* Adrian Dobra1 and Stephen E. Fienberg2 1 Institute
of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA ...
Source: Google Scholar
A warranty may, or may not, avert a new-home nightmare
If you buy a $5 shirt and then change your mind, chances are the merchant will give you your money back, no questions asked. And if the new car you buy doesn't run right, a lemon law is likely to protect you.
But, new-home buyer, beware. While purchasing a brand new house is the costliest expenditure many people will ever make in their lives, the home-building industry has a no-return, satisfaction-isn't-guaranteed policy.
Sure, every state has building codes and permitting processes that attempt to ensure that a new home is safe and livable before a buyer takes possession. Code inspectors, however, don't always spot big problems and a recent look into new-home construction by the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation found that the worst problems rarely surface within the first year.
On the business side, most successful builders try to do right by their customers. After all, as the National Association of Homebuilders points out, if a builder gets a bad rep in a community, his business is in jeopardy.
But despite government and industry efforts, once a new-home sale closes, any problems become the home buyer's, a pretty daunting thought for someone already facing a mortgage, moving hassles and decorating decisions. This is where new-home warranties are supposed to come in, to ease buyer worries and provide a recourse to get problems fixed promptly at little or no cost.
It doesn't always work that way.
The problem(s) with new homes An examination of the new-home construction field helps shed light on the genesis of these warranties.
Horror stories, written by both builders and homeowners, could fill libraries. A lot of the problems can be explained by who's telling the tale of the new home.
For homeowners, a house is their biggest investment. And when it's a new one, they naturally want it to be pristine and perfect, the dream home they've been waiting to inhabit. Unfortunately, such standards are not likely to be met, especially when the house is one of hundreds in a suburban development. Home-construction reality is that work occasionally slips with even the highest-quality builder in charge.
From the builder's point of view, many buyers come across as unreasonably demanding, seeking perfection when perfection isn't possible. That demand for perfection clouds the issue and makes it harder for people with serious problems to get them repaired.
The issue gets more complicated when it comes time to determine exactly what qualifies as a construction defect. Buyers and builders often have different definitions. Cracks in drywall or cement or the failure to follow the specs of a building plan precisely can drive a home buyer nuts, while the builder just shrugs.
Defining defects The NAHB put together a comprehensive guide to construction defects, Residential Construction Performance Guidelines, to bring some consistency to the issue. You can buy the book on the organization's Web site or find it in many public libraries.
The book documents what's an acceptable variation and what isn't; a 3/8-inch crack in cement is OK, but a 1/2-inch crack isn't. If you go to court, even small claims, and argue that a defect should be repaired, and the builder can point to chapter and verse in the book that the problem isn't a defect, you'll lose.
Even when there is an accepted defect, builders are rarely in a big hurry to fix it. The longer they delay, the more likely that the unhappy homeowner will give up and pay someone else to fix the problem or settle for a patch rather than a more-costly solution. The practice even has a name: lulling.
Here's how it works, according to Bruce K. Packard, litigation trial and appellate lawyer for Davis Munck in Dallas: "The washers in all 5,000 houses the developer built have a faulty connection to the water. Fixing the problem costs $100 per home or $500,000. If the builder can, he draws it out, so some people get sick of not having a washer. Sixty days later instead of 5,000 claims, it's dropped to 1,000. And it only costs him $100,000. That's a big savings."
Warranty rules, wants and "won't happens" To avoid many of these kinds of costly claims and improve their image, about 30 percent of home builders buy each of their customers an insurance-backed warranty. (New Jersey is the only state that requires builders to provide insurance-backed coverage, although other jurisdictions do demand the builder offer some type of make-good guarantee for a year.)
A warranty costs a builder about $300 a policy and usually the company passes along the cost to the home buyer, who rolls it into the mortgage. When a homeowner has a problem, he turns to the warranty company instead of the builder. (Home buyers can't purchase these warranties on their own. They have to ask the builder to buy one for them, because the policy warrants the builder's work.)
The policies are a combination of insurance and service contracts. Generally, they cover structural defects that become apparent after the first year. The largest providers are Home Buyers Warranty Corp. and Aon Warranty Group.
Home Buyers Warranty says that one in about 700 new homes has a major structural defect, costing more than $30,000 to repair. And about 50 percent of warranty claims concern houses whose builders have never had a claim before, says Stephen Graham, national warranty administration manager for the company. So even buying from a reputable builder won't protect a buyer completely.
The policies are very detailed and spell out their limitations. Home buyers are often disappointed by these limitations, says Packard.
Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings Inc., which lobbies for legislation to protect new-home buyers, examined a number of builder-backed and insurance-backed warranties and determined that while the policies may cover defects in things such as paint, flooring, cabinets, roofing and the like during the first year, it is unlikely they will cover such problems after that. In general, HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) and electrical defects are covered through the second year and after that only major structural defects are covered under these warranties.
"These warranties are loaded with exclusions and limitations that prevent the owner of a defective house from getting any relief," says Nancy Seats of Eureka, Mo., national president of HADD.
Even warranties issued in New Jersey where they are mandatory aren't particularly inclusive.
"Warranties are very restrictive. The defects aren't apparent until five or six years down the line. By then you're probably out of luck," says Lee Seglem, executive assistant to the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation, which examined construction defects in that state.
Arbitration issues These policies also are controversial because they demand that buyers agree to accept arbitration instead of litigation if there's a dispute.
HADD and other critics of arbitration say that even big companies like the nonprofit American Arbitration Association handle so many builder claims that arbitration has a builder bias.
Packard doesn't see such a bias: "I don't think that's true in the consumer arena where you are talking about claims of $5,000 to $20,000 tops."
Some experts advise refusing a warranty that requires you to waive your right to litigate. But Packard, even though he's a trial lawyer, believes that having a builder's warranty requiring arbitration on a new home is a good thing for most buyers since most people can't afford protracted legal action.
"Most homeowners don't have the cash to pay a lawyer on an hourly basis," says Packard. "And the small dollar amount of most claims makes it unlikely the lawyer will take a case on contingency. So it is very difficult for homeowners who end up in serious disputes to even get to court, let alone end up with a satisfactory result."
While they won't solve all repair problems, even with their drawbacks, insurance-backed warranties still can provide some help to the owner of a problem-plagued new home -- as long as the owner understands the coverage limitations. At the very least, you can expect a prompt hearing and evaluation from the warranty company.
"The builder has paid the money for the policy; he's out of the picture and he's not viewing your complaint as a costly aggravation," says Packard. "The risk of bankruptcy or stonewalling on complaints is much higher if you don't have an independent warranty."