Recent News and Articles on the Keywords: anti smoking + big + web  Related to the article below (Last Update: 8/7/2008)

Jerome Corsi's Shameless Hatchet Job on Barack Obama Huffington Post, NY - Aug 5, 2008 He states that Obama's smoking "should be a trivial concern," but three paragraphs later launches into an wholesale indictment based on this "trivial" ... Where There?s Smoke? Jackson Free Press, MS - With its television advertising and anti-smoking education outreach in the state?s schools, the program had shown huge success in cutting the state?s number ... Guest Opinion SX, Australia - Aug 5, 2008 Here in Australia we have the news that Qantas is about to reintroduce the sale of cigarettes on international flights, much to the chagrin of anti-smoking ... Undernews For August 6, 2008 Scoop.co.nz, New Zealand - Smoking Gun - Included in the affidavits is the government's bid to possibly explain why Ivins sent anthrax-filled letters to Tom Brokaw (an NBC ... More Evidence That Obama Is A Phony And Socialist Evening Bulletin all 914 news articles » White Trash Druggie Turned New York Times Reporter Writes Book Bloomberg - Aug 4, 2008 He was shooting coke as the next step after ``two hard years'' of smoking crack. Even with plenty of gruesome memories to draw on, Carr knows he's working ...NYT Editor-At-Large: Fat cats of the food industry only want us to eat ... Independent, UK - Jul 26, 2008 Smoking kills ? and it's generally the poor, rather than the rich, who succumb ? and it costs health agencies a fortune. Although we banned smoking from ... Humble clams gauge pollution levels The News Journal, DE - Aug 5, 2008 None of this is a smoking gun or an overturned barrel leaking PCBs. But environmentalists say that by slowly closing in on the problem, Phelps has brought ... Caught in Big Tobacco?s Web Pinoy Press, Philippines - Jul 24, 2008 Here are some links to stories and information that detail this scheme by the tobacco companies, and the challenges anti-smoking advocates are facing. ... Online Forum Cayman Net News, Cayman Islands - Aug 4, 2008 The whole anti-smoking movement is absurd and should be exposed as nothing but pharmaceutical greed. - Marlene McBakken The Diani Beach, Kenya, ... Rhyming in the rain Hornell Evening Tribune, NY - Jul 24, 2008 Poffo travels to schools and kids? programs around North America with a power point presentation and his book of anti-smoking poems, Limericks from the ...

Anti-Smoking Programs Have a Big Payoff

The more money states spend on tobacco control programs, the fewer cigarettes people in those states buy, according to a new study. In fact, between 1990 and 2000, cigarette sales dropped more than twice as much in states with strong anti-smoking programs as they did in the United States overall.

The finding shows that anti-tobacco efforts really work, experts say.

"It's encouraging for those in tobacco control to see that their investments have been worthwhile," said lead researcher Matthew Farrelly, PhD, director of the Public Health Economics and Policy Research Program at the Research Triangle Institute in North Carolina.

"This study provides our clearest evidence to date that tobacco control programs are an excellent investment in public health," said CDC director Julie Gerberding, MD.

Comprehensive Approach Works Best
Farrelly and colleagues from the CDC and the University of Illinois at Chicago compared cigarette sales in all 50 states with the amount of money each state spent on anti-smoking programs like advertising campaigns or telephone quitlines. Their findings were published in the Journal of Health Economics (Vol. 22, No. 5: 843-859).

States with bigger anti-tobacco budgets had lower cigarette sales. Four states with especially strong programs -- Arizona, California, Massachusetts and Oregon -- saw cigarette sales drop by 43% from 1990 to 2000. Sales in the US as a whole dropped by only 20% in that same period.

"These new data show that robust tobacco control programs reduce tobacco use," said co-author Terry Pechacek of the CDC.

The researchers weren't able to determine which specific programs were the most successful (whether quitlines work better than television ads, for example). But the four standout states did have something in common, Farrelly noted.

"They all had developed a comprehensive approach to reducing tobacco use," he said. The CDC has recommendations for states on how to develop these comprehensive programs. In general, they include a combination of community-based and school-based programs; counter-marketing through television, print and radio advertising; and cessation programs like telephone quitlines.

Farrelly's study isn't the first to suggest that tobacco control programs work. But it is the first to control for the impact of cigarette taxes on consumption. That's important, Farrelly said, because without that control, it's difficult to separate the effect of the state programs from the effect of higher cigarette prices caused by increased taxes.

His work shows much more conclusively that state anti-tobacco programs also contribute to the drop in smoking, he said.

Most States Don't Spend Enough
Unfortunately, most states fall far short when it comes to spending money on tobacco control. The CDC recommends states spend at least $5.98 per person each year on anti-smoking efforts; the average state spends just $1.22 per person, the researchers said.

They determined that if states had spent $6 per person on tobacco control efforts in 1994, cigarette sales would have fallen twice as quickly between 1994 and 2000 as they actually did.

At a time when many states are facing budget crises, the recommended $6 may seem like a lot of money. But Farrelly noted that successful tobacco-control programs get more efficient over time.

"The data seem to reflect that there's a lag between when you invest in tobacco control and when there's an impact," he said. "But what we did find was that expenditures in the past have an impact on current cigarette sales."

One reason may be that there's a natural learning process that goes with any big project; as people running the program gain experience, they become better at it.

Another possible explanation, Farrelly said, is the nature of tobacco addiction. "It takes time to convince smokers to quit and enable them with the tools to quit," he said.